<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 64 -  CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1542</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that service tax on outward freight and reimbursable expenses in clearing and forwarding services was not applicable. They held that the demands for service tax were time-barred, as all information was disclosed to the department. The decision emphasized the necessity of adhering to time limits for demanding service tax and ensuring compliance with legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 64 -  CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1542</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that service tax on outward freight and reimbursable expenses in clearing and forwarding services was not applicable. They held that the demands for service tax were time-barred, as all information was disclosed to the department. The decision emphasized the necessity of adhering to time limits for demanding service tax and ensuring compliance with legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>