<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 964 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176254</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part. It upheld the project completion method for income recognition, set aside the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for re-computation, and dismissed the ground related to the disallowance of various expenses. The decision highlighted the consistency and reasonableness of the accounting method used by the assessee, emphasizing the revenue-neutral aspect of any proposed changes by the tax department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 964 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176254</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part. It upheld the project completion method for income recognition, set aside the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for re-computation, and dismissed the ground related to the disallowance of various expenses. The decision highlighted the consistency and reasonableness of the accounting method used by the assessee, emphasizing the revenue-neutral aspect of any proposed changes by the tax department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>