<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 515 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176253</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the Assessing Officer for excess area allotted to tenants and flats allotted to bogus tenants. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the Revenue&#039;s claims, emphasizing the necessity for material evidence in tax assessments. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s findings based on lack of direct evidence of unlawful consideration received by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 515 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176253</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the Assessing Officer for excess area allotted to tenants and flats allotted to bogus tenants. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the Revenue&#039;s claims, emphasizing the necessity for material evidence in tax assessments. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s findings based on lack of direct evidence of unlawful consideration received by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>