<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 927 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176250</link>
    <description>Compliance with the deposit conditions imposed under the Tribunal&#039;s stay order was required for grant of stay under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act read with Section 83 of the Finance Act. The order required deposit of interest and 25% of the penalty, and failure to comply was treated as non-compliance with the statutory stay requirements. The appeal was dismissed on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:27:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 927 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176250</link>
      <description>Compliance with the deposit conditions imposed under the Tribunal&#039;s stay order was required for grant of stay under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act read with Section 83 of the Finance Act. The order required deposit of interest and 25% of the penalty, and failure to comply was treated as non-compliance with the statutory stay requirements. The appeal was dismissed on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>