https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176241 Pentazocine, though listed as a psychotropic substance under the NDPS Act, was treated as outside the prohibitory scheme relied on by the prosecution because Rule 64 of the NDPS Rules applies only to psychotropic substances specified in Schedule I to the Rules. The applicant was associated with a duly authorised drug business, and pentazocine was described as a Schedule H medicine under the Drugs and Cosmetics regime. As pentazocine was not shown to be included in Schedule I, the statutory prohibition invoked to resist bail was not attracted. The applicant was therefore entitled to bail, and the embargo under Section 37 of the NDPS Act did not apply. en-us Tue, 07 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:10:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176241 Pentazocine, though listed as a psychotropic substance under the NDPS Act, was treated as outside the prohibitory scheme relied on by the prosecution because Rule 64 of the NDPS Rules applies only to psychotropic substances specified in Schedule I to the Rules. The applicant was associated with a duly authorised drug business, and pentazocine was described as a Schedule H medicine under the Drugs and Cosmetics regime. As pentazocine was not shown to be included in Schedule I, the statutory prohibition invoked to resist bail was not attracted. The applicant was therefore entitled to bail, and the embargo under Section 37 of the NDPS Act did not apply. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 07 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176241