https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176240 A High Court should not keep a bail order in abeyance merely because a similar bail matter has been referred to a larger Bench, especially where there is no independent adverse finding against the accused. Here, the Special Judge had granted bail on consideration of the materials and relevant decisions, but the High Court stayed that relief solely due to the reference in another case, leaving the appellant incarcerated indefinitely. The reliance on Rule 66 of the NDPS Rules did not justify such a suspension in the circumstances. The stay order was set aside and the bail order was restored. en-us Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:59:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176240 A High Court should not keep a bail order in abeyance merely because a similar bail matter has been referred to a larger Bench, especially where there is no independent adverse finding against the accused. Here, the Special Judge had granted bail on consideration of the materials and relevant decisions, but the High Court stayed that relief solely due to the reference in another case, leaving the appellant incarcerated indefinitely. The reliance on Rule 66 of the NDPS Rules did not justify such a suspension in the circumstances. The stay order was set aside and the bail order was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176240