<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 701 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176238</link>
    <description>Section 80 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, read with the cited decisions, was considered sufficiently important to warrant reference to a larger Bench. Leave was granted, and the Registry was directed to place the papers before the Chief Justice for constitution of a 3-Judge Bench. The matter was thus referred for consideration by a 3-Judge Bench on the effect of Section 80 and the earlier authorities cited.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:52:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 701 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176238</link>
      <description>Section 80 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, read with the cited decisions, was considered sufficiently important to warrant reference to a larger Bench. Leave was granted, and the Registry was directed to place the papers before the Chief Justice for constitution of a 3-Judge Bench. The matter was thus referred for consideration by a 3-Judge Bench on the effect of Section 80 and the earlier authorities cited.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>