<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1526 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176233</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the addition of outstanding labour charges under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the lack of evidence of payment or genuineness of the charges, leading to the classification of the liability as ceased. Legal precedents and factual analysis supported the decision to add the charges to the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1526 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176233</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the addition of outstanding labour charges under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the lack of evidence of payment or genuineness of the charges, leading to the classification of the liability as ceased. Legal precedents and factual analysis supported the decision to add the charges to the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>