<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1152 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176223</link>
    <description>The appeal against the ITAT order regarding deduction u/s 80HHC was disposed of in favor of the assessee. The court ruled in favor of the assessee on questions 1, 2, 5, and 6, while questions 3 and 4 were deemed irrelevant and not pressed by the appellant. The court&#039;s decision aligned with previous judgments and upheld adherence to Supreme Court precedent in quantifying the deduction, ultimately ruling against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1152 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176223</link>
      <description>The appeal against the ITAT order regarding deduction u/s 80HHC was disposed of in favor of the assessee. The court ruled in favor of the assessee on questions 1, 2, 5, and 6, while questions 3 and 4 were deemed irrelevant and not pressed by the appellant. The court&#039;s decision aligned with previous judgments and upheld adherence to Supreme Court precedent in quantifying the deduction, ultimately ruling against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>