<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (1) TMI 22 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176214</link>
    <description>Expenditure incurred in opening new branches, sub-branches and pay offices was held not to be capable of arbitrary spread over twenty years; where the outlay was otherwise admissible under Section 10(2)(xv), the whole amount was deductible in the year incurred. The same principle applied to branch-opening and publicity-related expenses, including advertisement, entertainment, photographs and invitation cards. Because the expenditure was incurred for expansion of an existing business, and did not create a new asset or enduring capital advantage, it was treated as revenue expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the business and fully allowable in the relevant year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:04:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (1) TMI 22 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176214</link>
      <description>Expenditure incurred in opening new branches, sub-branches and pay offices was held not to be capable of arbitrary spread over twenty years; where the outlay was otherwise admissible under Section 10(2)(xv), the whole amount was deductible in the year incurred. The same principle applied to branch-opening and publicity-related expenses, including advertisement, entertainment, photographs and invitation cards. Because the expenditure was incurred for expansion of an existing business, and did not create a new asset or enduring capital advantage, it was treated as revenue expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the business and fully allowable in the relevant year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>