<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 908 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269604</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding revenue expenditure, emphasizing the distinction between capital and revenue expenditure under the Income Tax Act and rejecting deferred revenue expenditure. The Court highlighted the importance of considering commercial sense and enduring benefits in determining expenditure nature, regardless of its treatment in the books of account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 06:45:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 908 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269604</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding revenue expenditure, emphasizing the distinction between capital and revenue expenditure under the Income Tax Act and rejecting deferred revenue expenditure. The Court highlighted the importance of considering commercial sense and enduring benefits in determining expenditure nature, regardless of its treatment in the books of account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>