<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 901 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269597</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the activities conducted were charitable in nature and not considered trade, commerce, or business under the proviso to section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. The contributions from non-members were deemed as part of the declared objectives and did not alter the charitable status of the assessee. The concept of mutuality was correctly understood, and the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 901 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269597</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the activities conducted were charitable in nature and not considered trade, commerce, or business under the proviso to section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act. The contributions from non-members were deemed as part of the declared objectives and did not alter the charitable status of the assessee. The concept of mutuality was correctly understood, and the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>