<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 893 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269589</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow exemption under section 54EC of the IT Act to the assessee. The judgment emphasized the accurate interpretation of statutory timeline provisions in alignment with legal principles and precedents, ultimately upholding the relief granted to the assessee regarding the investment made in NHAI Ltd. bonds within the permissible timeline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 06:44:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 893 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269589</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow exemption under section 54EC of the IT Act to the assessee. The judgment emphasized the accurate interpretation of statutory timeline provisions in alignment with legal principles and precedents, ultimately upholding the relief granted to the assessee regarding the investment made in NHAI Ltd. bonds within the permissible timeline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>