<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 891 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269587</link>
    <description>The tribunal found that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was unjustified as the disputed amounts were carried over from earlier years and part of the trading account. The tribunal held that the penalty was imposed without proper appreciation of the issues and the assessee&#039;s explanation, which was deemed bona fide. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 17-10-2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 06:44:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 891 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269587</link>
      <description>The tribunal found that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was unjustified as the disputed amounts were carried over from earlier years and part of the trading account. The tribunal held that the penalty was imposed without proper appreciation of the issues and the assessee&#039;s explanation, which was deemed bona fide. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on 17-10-2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>