<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 886 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269582</link>
    <description>The company&#039;s application for registration under section 12AA of the Income-Tax Act was initially rejected by the CIT due to perceived lack of substantial charitable activities. However, the Tribunal overturned this decision, emphasizing the company&#039;s charitable efforts and compliance with queries. The Tribunal highlighted that registration under section 12AA does not automatically guarantee exemption under section 11. Subsequently, the Tribunal directed the CIT to grant approval under section 80G of the Act to the company, ensuring the company&#039;s eligibility for tax benefits. The Tribunal&#039;s decision allowed both appeals, setting aside the initial rejections by the CIT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 06:44:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 886 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269582</link>
      <description>The company&#039;s application for registration under section 12AA of the Income-Tax Act was initially rejected by the CIT due to perceived lack of substantial charitable activities. However, the Tribunal overturned this decision, emphasizing the company&#039;s charitable efforts and compliance with queries. The Tribunal highlighted that registration under section 12AA does not automatically guarantee exemption under section 11. Subsequently, the Tribunal directed the CIT to grant approval under section 80G of the Act to the company, ensuring the company&#039;s eligibility for tax benefits. The Tribunal&#039;s decision allowed both appeals, setting aside the initial rejections by the CIT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>