<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 884 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269580</link>
    <description>The tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the refund claim with interest to be paid within thirty days. The decision emphasized the importance of examining all relevant documents and evidence presented by the appellant to determine the validity of a refund claim, stating that procedural deficiencies should not penalize claimants if the substance of the claim is supported by credible evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 884 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269580</link>
      <description>The tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the refund claim with interest to be paid within thirty days. The decision emphasized the importance of examining all relevant documents and evidence presented by the appellant to determine the validity of a refund claim, stating that procedural deficiencies should not penalize claimants if the substance of the claim is supported by credible evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>