<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 867 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269563</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that equalized delivery charges, when separately mentioned in the invoices, should be deductible for calculating the assessable value of goods. The decision was supported by legal precedents and specific circumstances, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit requirements and a stay of recovery during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 06:41:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 867 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269563</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that equalized delivery charges, when separately mentioned in the invoices, should be deductible for calculating the assessable value of goods. The decision was supported by legal precedents and specific circumstances, leading to the waiver of pre-deposit requirements and a stay of recovery during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>