https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269561 The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on the appellants under Rule 26 for aiding and abetting evasion of Central Excise duty by the company. The request for an unconditional stay was rejected, emphasizing the active roles of the appellants in the offense. The interpretation of Rule 26 clarified that penalties could be imposed without confiscation of goods. The Tribunal directed the appellants to make pre-deposits in compliance with the Central Excise Act, considering the prima facie view of duty evasion by the company. en-us Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Dec 2015 07:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269561 The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on the appellants under Rule 26 for aiding and abetting evasion of Central Excise duty by the company. The request for an unconditional stay was rejected, emphasizing the active roles of the appellants in the offense. The interpretation of Rule 26 clarified that penalties could be imposed without confiscation of goods. The Tribunal directed the appellants to make pre-deposits in compliance with the Central Excise Act, considering the prima facie view of duty evasion by the company. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269561