<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 709 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176206</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act against the assessee for concealing income detected during a survey by the department. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty imposition based on the lack of voluntary disclosure of income by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized that mens rea is not necessary for imposing such penalties, citing relevant judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:58:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 709 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176206</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act against the assessee for concealing income detected during a survey by the department. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalty imposition based on the lack of voluntary disclosure of income by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized that mens rea is not necessary for imposing such penalties, citing relevant judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>