<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 954 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that franchisee fees received by the DPS Society were not taxable as business income under Section 11(4A) of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the allowance of depreciation on fixed assets, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s claim of double deduction. The Tribunal emphasized consistency in its rulings and the correct application of legal provisions and precedents, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 09:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 954 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that franchisee fees received by the DPS Society were not taxable as business income under Section 11(4A) of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the allowance of depreciation on fixed assets, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s claim of double deduction. The Tribunal emphasized consistency in its rulings and the correct application of legal provisions and precedents, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>