<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 953 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176200</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the decision of the Assessing Officer (A.O.) and upheld the appellant&#039;s claim for adjustment of brought forward losses and depreciation before allowing exemption u/s 10B, citing recent legal pronouncements. However, the Tribunal remanded the issue of non-allowance of provision for fringe benefit tax from book profits u/s 115JB back to the A.O. for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for a detailed examination and providing the appellant with a reasonable opportunity to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 953 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176200</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the decision of the Assessing Officer (A.O.) and upheld the appellant&#039;s claim for adjustment of brought forward losses and depreciation before allowing exemption u/s 10B, citing recent legal pronouncements. However, the Tribunal remanded the issue of non-allowance of provision for fringe benefit tax from book profits u/s 115JB back to the A.O. for reconsideration, emphasizing the need for a detailed examination and providing the appellant with a reasonable opportunity to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>