<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1929 (10) TMI 1 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176192</link>
    <description>A combined notice requiring attendance and production of accounts was held valid, and non-compliance with it could justify best judgment assessment under section 23(4) on the Income Tax Officer&#039;s information. Filing a return under section 22(2) did not prevent the officer from calling for accounts and personal attendance before deciding whether to accept the return. A further notice under section 23(2) was not required where the assessee failed to comply with a lawful notice under section 22(4). The reference was answered against the assessee, and the assessment power under section 23(4) was upheld on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:11:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1929 (10) TMI 1 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176192</link>
      <description>A combined notice requiring attendance and production of accounts was held valid, and non-compliance with it could justify best judgment assessment under section 23(4) on the Income Tax Officer&#039;s information. Filing a return under section 22(2) did not prevent the officer from calling for accounts and personal attendance before deciding whether to accept the return. A further notice under section 23(2) was not required where the assessee failed to comply with a lawful notice under section 22(4). The reference was answered against the assessee, and the assessment power under section 23(4) was upheld on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>