<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 899 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176171</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the civil appeals was condoned, and the Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals thereafter. No further legal reasoning, statutory interpretation, or substantive central excise issue is set out in the supplied text.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 899 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176171</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the civil appeals was condoned, and the Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals thereafter. No further legal reasoning, statutory interpretation, or substantive central excise issue is set out in the supplied text.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>