<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 797 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269493</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration application and recalled the order dismissing the appeal for non-compliance, restoring the appeal for decision on merits. The Tribunal considered the circumstances and legal precedents, emphasizing the statutory right to appeal and the condition of pre-deposit not being a bar to restoration if compliance is eventually met. The decision was based on principles established in previous judgments, allowing for the restoration of the appeal and setting it for a decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:40:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 797 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269493</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the restoration application and recalled the order dismissing the appeal for non-compliance, restoring the appeal for decision on merits. The Tribunal considered the circumstances and legal precedents, emphasizing the statutory right to appeal and the condition of pre-deposit not being a bar to restoration if compliance is eventually met. The decision was based on principles established in previous judgments, allowing for the restoration of the appeal and setting it for a decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>