<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 788 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and stay petition against the suspension of the Custom House Agent Licence, emphasizing the premature nature of the appeal due to the prescribed time period for completing enquiry proceedings under the CBLR, 2013. The judgment clarified the distinction between suspension and punishment, highlighting that the appeal was not sustainable given the procedural stage of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 20:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 788 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and stay petition against the suspension of the Custom House Agent Licence, emphasizing the premature nature of the appeal due to the prescribed time period for completing enquiry proceedings under the CBLR, 2013. The judgment clarified the distinction between suspension and punishment, highlighting that the appeal was not sustainable given the procedural stage of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>