<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 784 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269480</link>
    <description>Delay in filing statutory appeals under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 was treated as condonable where the explanation showed no deliberate or mala fide attempt to prolong proceedings. The writ court held that, despite rejection by the appellate authority for delay and non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements, the appeals should be considered on merits in the interest of justice. The delay was therefore condoned, and the appellant was allowed to re-present the appeals for adjudication on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 20:40:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 784 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269480</link>
      <description>Delay in filing statutory appeals under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 was treated as condonable where the explanation showed no deliberate or mala fide attempt to prolong proceedings. The writ court held that, despite rejection by the appellate authority for delay and non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements, the appeals should be considered on merits in the interest of justice. The delay was therefore condoned, and the appellant was allowed to re-present the appeals for adjudication on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>