https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269478 The Court declined to entertain the writ petition because a full and efficacious statutory appellate remedy was available, and the challenge to the assessment order could be pursued before that forum. It did not examine the alleged breach of natural justice, the departmental circular, or the merits of the input tax credit reversal dispute under Section 19(20) of the TNVAT Act, 2006. The petition was therefore dismissed without adjudication on merits, and the petitioner was directed to seek relief before the appellate authority. en-us Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Dec 2015 20:39:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269478 The Court declined to entertain the writ petition because a full and efficacious statutory appellate remedy was available, and the challenge to the assessment order could be pursued before that forum. It did not examine the alleged breach of natural justice, the departmental circular, or the merits of the input tax credit reversal dispute under Section 19(20) of the TNVAT Act, 2006. The petition was therefore dismissed without adjudication on merits, and the petitioner was directed to seek relief before the appellate authority. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269478