https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269476 The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the Joint Registrar and the learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court, concluding that the documents sought to be summoned were not relevant for the resolution of the suit. The Court emphasized its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India and found no grounds to interfere, as the earlier findings on the relevance of the documents had been upheld. Previous applications seeking similar documents had been dismissed, with the Court noting that the suit was a simple recovery matter and the documents were needed for separate investigations. en-us Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Dec 2015 20:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269476 The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the Joint Registrar and the learned Single Judge of the Delhi High Court, concluding that the documents sought to be summoned were not relevant for the resolution of the suit. The Court emphasized its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India and found no grounds to interfere, as the earlier findings on the relevance of the documents had been upheld. Previous applications seeking similar documents had been dismissed, with the Court noting that the suit was a simple recovery matter and the documents were needed for separate investigations. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 11 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269476