<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 760 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269456</link>
    <description>The appeal against the CIT(A) order for the assessment year 2005-06 was dismissed. The case focused on the treatment of remission of liability by a bank as a capital receipt under the Income Tax Act, particularly regarding its taxation under Sec. 115JB. The appellant argued for the exclusion of certain receipts from book profits and emphasized compliance with statutory reporting requirements. The legislative intent behind Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) and its impact on book profits were also discussed. Ultimately, the tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal, considering the interpretation of relevant sections and judicial decisions on excluded receipts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 06:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 760 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269456</link>
      <description>The appeal against the CIT(A) order for the assessment year 2005-06 was dismissed. The case focused on the treatment of remission of liability by a bank as a capital receipt under the Income Tax Act, particularly regarding its taxation under Sec. 115JB. The appellant argued for the exclusion of certain receipts from book profits and emphasized compliance with statutory reporting requirements. The legislative intent behind Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) and its impact on book profits were also discussed. Ultimately, the tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeal, considering the interpretation of relevant sections and judicial decisions on excluded receipts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>