https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269438 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's decision to set aside the circulars shortening revalidation periods for licenses. The Court found the circulars to be biased, arbitrary, and discriminatory, emphasizing the need for equal treatment of license holders. It directed processing of the appellant's revalidation application within four weeks, declaring the discrimination in revalidation periods as arbitrary and stressing fair treatment for all license holders. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269438 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's decision to set aside the circulars shortening revalidation periods for licenses. The Court found the circulars to be biased, arbitrary, and discriminatory, emphasizing the need for equal treatment of license holders. It directed processing of the appellant's revalidation application within four weeks, declaring the discrimination in revalidation periods as arbitrary and stressing fair treatment for all license holders. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269438