https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269428 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that paying more duty at the time of clearance effectively reversed the entire credit, including the SAD component. The tribunal found in favor of the appellant on the merits and limitation grounds, stating that the appellant had fulfilled their obligations by paying more duty, eliminating the need for separate reversal of SAD credit. Additionally, the tribunal concluded that the appellant had complied with the CENVAT Credit Rules, setting aside the demand raised against them and providing consequential relief. en-us Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269428 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing that paying more duty at the time of clearance effectively reversed the entire credit, including the SAD component. The tribunal found in favor of the appellant on the merits and limitation grounds, stating that the appellant had fulfilled their obligations by paying more duty, eliminating the need for separate reversal of SAD credit. Additionally, the tribunal concluded that the appellant had complied with the CENVAT Credit Rules, setting aside the demand raised against them and providing consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269428