<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 728 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269424</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to the failure to consider crucial evidence, including discrepancies in import prices and grammage of tissue paper, and the unjustified comparison of imported products with dissimilar goods. The appellant&#039;s contentions were dismissed by the original adjudicating authority and Commissioner (Appeals), despite supporting evidence from the supplier. The lack of findings on quality differences and manufacturer details further contributed to the decision to overturn the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 728 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269424</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order due to the failure to consider crucial evidence, including discrepancies in import prices and grammage of tissue paper, and the unjustified comparison of imported products with dissimilar goods. The appellant&#039;s contentions were dismissed by the original adjudicating authority and Commissioner (Appeals), despite supporting evidence from the supplier. The lack of findings on quality differences and manufacturer details further contributed to the decision to overturn the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>