<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 722 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269418</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow re-export of goods without imposing redemption fine or penalty. The discrepancy between the goods ordered and received was confirmed based on the purchase order, absolving the importer of malafide intent. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal found no merit, supporting the Commissioner&#039;s ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 22:03:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 722 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269418</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow re-export of goods without imposing redemption fine or penalty. The discrepancy between the goods ordered and received was confirmed based on the purchase order, absolving the importer of malafide intent. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal found no merit, supporting the Commissioner&#039;s ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>