https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269406 Copyright registration under Section 48 is only prima facie evidence and does not conclusively prove authorship or title. On the material described, the claimant failed to establish clear subsisting copyright title or standing, because the record cast doubt on sole authorship and valid title transfer. The prior assignment to Zee was stated to vest rights in perpetuity, with no shown re-assignment or reversion, so the copyright did not return to the claimant and Zee was necessary to resolve the dispute. The claimant also failed to prove a confidential disclosure made by it, or substantial similarity between the works sufficient for infringement or springboard relief. Interim protection was therefore refused. en-us Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Dec 2015 08:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269406 Copyright registration under Section 48 is only prima facie evidence and does not conclusively prove authorship or title. On the material described, the claimant failed to establish clear subsisting copyright title or standing, because the record cast doubt on sole authorship and valid title transfer. The prior assignment to Zee was stated to vest rights in perpetuity, with no shown re-assignment or reversion, so the copyright did not return to the claimant and Zee was necessary to resolve the dispute. The claimant also failed to prove a confidential disclosure made by it, or substantial similarity between the works sufficient for infringement or springboard relief. Interim protection was therefore refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269406