<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 585 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176140</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee due to the non-service of notice u/s 143(2) within the prescribed time, leading to the cancellation of the assessment. The Tribunal found the assessment invalid, citing the decision in CIT vs. Vardhman Estate (P) Ltd. The applicability of Section 292BB of the IT Act, 1961, was also considered, determining it was not applicable to the relevant assessment year. As a result, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:53:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 585 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176140</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee due to the non-service of notice u/s 143(2) within the prescribed time, leading to the cancellation of the assessment. The Tribunal found the assessment invalid, citing the decision in CIT vs. Vardhman Estate (P) Ltd. The applicability of Section 292BB of the IT Act, 1961, was also considered, determining it was not applicable to the relevant assessment year. As a result, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>