<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 514 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176137</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenge. The court found no substantial question of law, considering the genuine explanation provided by the assessee and the retrospective effect of the relevant provision. The legal contentions raised by the assessee regarding Section 14A were deemed plausible, leading to the decision to confirm the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 514 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176137</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenge. The court found no substantial question of law, considering the genuine explanation provided by the assessee and the retrospective effect of the relevant provision. The legal contentions raised by the assessee regarding Section 14A were deemed plausible, leading to the decision to confirm the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>