<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 727 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176134</link>
    <description>The High Court of Gujarat upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow a bad debt claim of Rs. 42,38,439 by the assessee under the IT Act, 1961. Despite the Revenue&#039;s arguments that the debt was not bad due to debt recovery suits and changes in the company&#039;s activities, the Court found in favor of the assessee. Citing legal precedents and considering the company&#039;s multiple activities before ceasing ginning and pressing operations, the Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the varied activities did not invalidate the bad debt claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 727 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176134</link>
      <description>The High Court of Gujarat upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow a bad debt claim of Rs. 42,38,439 by the assessee under the IT Act, 1961. Despite the Revenue&#039;s arguments that the debt was not bad due to debt recovery suits and changes in the company&#039;s activities, the Court found in favor of the assessee. Citing legal precedents and considering the company&#039;s multiple activities before ceasing ginning and pressing operations, the Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the varied activities did not invalidate the bad debt claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>