<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 69 - CESTAT,BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1484</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore allowed the appeal for duty refund to the appellants, as it was established that the duty burden was not passed on to the buyer despite discrepancies in certificates from the Chartered Accountant. The Tribunal found that the goods were sold at a loss below the enhanced value, indicating no unjust enrichment and supporting the refund claim of Rs. 17,62,044.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 69 - CESTAT,BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1484</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore allowed the appeal for duty refund to the appellants, as it was established that the duty burden was not passed on to the buyer despite discrepancies in certificates from the Chartered Accountant. The Tribunal found that the goods were sold at a loss below the enhanced value, indicating no unjust enrichment and supporting the refund claim of Rs. 17,62,044.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>