<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (8) TMI 15 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176128</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Sub-Judge&#039;s remand order to value partnership assets at market value for equitable winding-up post-dissolution. The judgment emphasized the need for a fair distribution of assets among partners and highlighted that partners should not exploit asset appreciation for individual gain upon dissolution, necessitating a real valuation based on market value at the dissolution date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:35:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (8) TMI 15 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176128</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Sub-Judge&#039;s remand order to value partnership assets at market value for equitable winding-up post-dissolution. The judgment emphasized the need for a fair distribution of assets among partners and highlighted that partners should not exploit asset appreciation for individual gain upon dissolution, necessitating a real valuation based on market value at the dissolution date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>