<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 338 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176126</link>
    <description>The High Court held that deductions under sections 80-I and 80-J should be calculated based on the full amount of income received from the priority or new undertaking without adjusting profits or losses between units. The Court distinguished the case from Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. vs. CIT, emphasizing the wording differences in the relevant sections. The petitioner&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and they were directed to pay the respondent&#039;s costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 338 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176126</link>
      <description>The High Court held that deductions under sections 80-I and 80-J should be calculated based on the full amount of income received from the priority or new undertaking without adjusting profits or losses between units. The Court distinguished the case from Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. vs. CIT, emphasizing the wording differences in the relevant sections. The petitioner&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and they were directed to pay the respondent&#039;s costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>