<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 705 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions related to undisclosed investment, undisclosed purchase, and income from other sources. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering all evidence and explanations provided by the assessee before making additions based on incomplete or inaccurate data.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 10:42:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 705 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions related to undisclosed investment, undisclosed purchase, and income from other sources. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering all evidence and explanations provided by the assessee before making additions based on incomplete or inaccurate data.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>