<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 688 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269384</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for thorough verification of outstanding or payable amounts before applying sec.40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The decision highlighted the importance of providing the assessee with a fair opportunity to present their case in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 688 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269384</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for thorough verification of outstanding or payable amounts before applying sec.40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The decision highlighted the importance of providing the assessee with a fair opportunity to present their case in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>