https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269378 The Tribunal set aside the order-in-appeal regarding non-discharge of service tax liability under "Man Power Recruitment or Supply Services," finding the appellant engaged in job work rather than supplying manpower to Tata Motors. The Tribunal considered the payment agreement as a lump sum contract for parts manufacturing, not manpower supply, citing precedents like Bavariya Enterprises Ltd. and Shriram Sao TVS Ltd. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. en-us Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 May 2016 17:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269378 The Tribunal set aside the order-in-appeal regarding non-discharge of service tax liability under "Man Power Recruitment or Supply Services," finding the appellant engaged in job work rather than supplying manpower to Tata Motors. The Tribunal considered the payment agreement as a lump sum contract for parts manufacturing, not manpower supply, citing precedents like Bavariya Enterprises Ltd. and Shriram Sao TVS Ltd. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269378