<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 91 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of the cost of gunny bags in the assessable value of cement due to lack of evidence from the appellants. However, the penalty of Rs. 25,000 was set aside considering the situation where records were destroyed, preventing the establishment of the returnable nature of the gunny bags.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 91 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of the cost of gunny bags in the assessable value of cement due to lack of evidence from the appellants. However, the penalty of Rs. 25,000 was set aside considering the situation where records were destroyed, preventing the establishment of the returnable nature of the gunny bags.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>