https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269368 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad centered on the eligibility of the appellant for a refund of service tax paid up to 19.01.2012. The appellant's claim of mistaken deposit in the name of another entity was dismissed, as the first appellate authority found that the appellant was the registered unit during the relevant period. Despite an adjournment request due to a social engagement, which was denied, the Tribunal upheld the rejection of the appeal on both substantive and procedural grounds. The judgment emphasized the importance of compliance with tax regulations and active participation in legal proceedings for a fair resolution. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Dec 2015 10:20:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269368 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad centered on the eligibility of the appellant for a refund of service tax paid up to 19.01.2012. The appellant's claim of mistaken deposit in the name of another entity was dismissed, as the first appellate authority found that the appellant was the registered unit during the relevant period. Despite an adjournment request due to a social engagement, which was denied, the Tribunal upheld the rejection of the appeal on both substantive and procedural grounds. The judgment emphasized the importance of compliance with tax regulations and active participation in legal proceedings for a fair resolution. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269368