https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269363 The Tribunal had confined adjudication to January 1997 to October 1997 on the view that the relevant price list related to another unit. The record showed that the price list in question pertained to a different unit and not to the Pune unit, so the restriction was modified. The Department's invocation of the longer period on grounds of suppression and misstatement was left open for the Commissioner to examine on remand, on the basis of the record and in accordance with law. The matter was therefore to be considered for the full period from January 1995 to October 1997. en-us Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jan 2016 10:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269363 The Tribunal had confined adjudication to January 1997 to October 1997 on the view that the relevant price list related to another unit. The record showed that the price list in question pertained to a different unit and not to the Pune unit, so the restriction was modified. The Department's invocation of the longer period on grounds of suppression and misstatement was left open for the Commissioner to examine on remand, on the basis of the record and in accordance with law. The matter was therefore to be considered for the full period from January 1995 to October 1997. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269363