<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 664 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269360</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the civil appeal, affirming the HC&#039;s decision that Amendment Notification No. 10/2004 was invalid. The notification was deemed to apply prospectively, rendering the show cause notice for demands predating its issuance invalid. The subject matter was considered tax neutral, resulting in the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 664 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269360</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the civil appeal, affirming the HC&#039;s decision that Amendment Notification No. 10/2004 was invalid. The notification was deemed to apply prospectively, rendering the show cause notice for demands predating its issuance invalid. The subject matter was considered tax neutral, resulting in the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>