<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 68 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1475</link>
    <description>The Tribunal referred the case regarding the valuation of a motor vehicle manufactured through job work to a Larger Bench to determine whether the value of inputs under rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules should be considered for valuing the final product. The decision emphasizes the need for clarity in applying valuation rules under the Central Excise Act to ensure consistency in excise valuation practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 68 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1475</link>
      <description>The Tribunal referred the case regarding the valuation of a motor vehicle manufactured through job work to a Larger Bench to determine whether the value of inputs under rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules should be considered for valuing the final product. The decision emphasizes the need for clarity in applying valuation rules under the Central Excise Act to ensure consistency in excise valuation practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>