<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 649 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269345</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal through remand, emphasizing the importance of proper examination of the case on its merits rather than mere statistical disposal. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to valid reasons provided by the appellant, criticizing the lower appellate authority&#039;s mechanical dismissal without considering the condonable period. The matter was remanded for a decision on merits after providing a reasonable opportunity for the appellant to be heard, ensuring justice was not compromised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:29:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 649 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269345</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal through remand, emphasizing the importance of proper examination of the case on its merits rather than mere statistical disposal. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to valid reasons provided by the appellant, criticizing the lower appellate authority&#039;s mechanical dismissal without considering the condonable period. The matter was remanded for a decision on merits after providing a reasonable opportunity for the appellant to be heard, ensuring justice was not compromised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>