<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 645 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269341</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the assessable value of imported Ball Valves. The Tribunal found that the Revenue lacked sufficient evidence to challenge the declared transaction value and had merely relied on the Chartered Accountant&#039;s opinion without proper scrutiny. As the Revenue failed to present compelling evidence to dispute the transaction value, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the importance of thorough assessment and consideration of all relevant factors in determining the correct assessable value of imported goods to avoid unjust penalties or confiscation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:25:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 645 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269341</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the assessable value of imported Ball Valves. The Tribunal found that the Revenue lacked sufficient evidence to challenge the declared transaction value and had merely relied on the Chartered Accountant&#039;s opinion without proper scrutiny. As the Revenue failed to present compelling evidence to dispute the transaction value, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the importance of thorough assessment and consideration of all relevant factors in determining the correct assessable value of imported goods to avoid unjust penalties or confiscation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>